Triple
T2114205
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | AES-CTR |
E42568
|
entity |
| Predicate | vulnerableIfNonceReused |
P27632
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [AES-CTR, vulnerableIfNonceReused, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: vulnerableIfNonceReused Context triple: [AES-CTR, vulnerableIfNonceReused, true]
-
A.
usesNonce
Indicates that one entity employs a nonce (a unique, typically one-time-use value) as part of its interaction or operation with another entity.
-
B.
requiresNonceUniqueness
chosen
Indicates that the action or process demands each nonce value be unique, preventing reuse across operations or transactions.
-
C.
consideredInsecureAtKeySize
Indicates that a cryptographic algorithm or mechanism is regarded as insecure when used with a specified key size.
-
D.
keyReuse
Indicates that the same key is used multiple times, rather than being uniquely generated or dedicated for a single use or context.
-
E.
usesInitializationVectorLength
Indicates that an entity employs an initialization vector (IV) of a specified length in a cryptographic or security-related operation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8871040f08190aac2e2d0ab6b47ad |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbb05b51c81908a78c816f492c45c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7ba08948190a3c236bb53ee4257 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:43 p.m.