Triple

T21140211
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Electoral Courts of Brazil E520908 entity
Predicate headquartersLocation P62 FINISHED
Object Brasília (for Superior Electoral Court) — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brasília (for Superior Electoral Court) | Statement: [Electoral Courts of Brazil, headquartersLocation, Brasília (for Superior Electoral Court)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Brasília (for Superior Electoral Court)
Context triple: [Electoral Courts of Brazil, headquartersLocation, Brasília (for Superior Electoral Court)]
  • A. Superior Electoral Court of Brazil
    The Superior Electoral Court of Brazil is the country’s highest judicial body responsible for overseeing and adjudicating matters related to elections and electoral law.
  • B. Superior Court of Justice of Brazil
    The Superior Court of Justice of Brazil is the country’s highest non-constitutional court, responsible for standardizing the interpretation of federal law across the Brazilian judiciary.
  • C. House of Appeals of Brazil
    The House of Appeals of Brazil was a former high-level judicial body that functioned as a national court of appeal before the establishment of the modern Supreme Federal Court.
  • D. Court of Justice of Tocantins
    The Court of Justice of Tocantins is the highest judicial authority in the Brazilian state of Tocantins, responsible for overseeing state-level civil, criminal, and administrative cases.
  • E. Supreme Federal Court of Brazil
    The Supreme Federal Court of Brazil is the country’s highest judicial authority and constitutional court, responsible for interpreting the Constitution and serving as the final arbiter in major legal and political disputes.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Brasília (for Superior Electoral Court)
Target entity description: Brasília (for Superior Electoral Court) is the federal capital of Brazil and the seat of the country’s Superior Electoral Court, where national electoral administration and oversight are centralized.
  • A. Superior Electoral Court of Brazil
    The Superior Electoral Court of Brazil is the country’s highest judicial body responsible for overseeing and adjudicating matters related to elections and electoral law.
  • B. Superior Court of Justice of Brazil
    The Superior Court of Justice of Brazil is the country’s highest non-constitutional court, responsible for standardizing the interpretation of federal law across the Brazilian judiciary.
  • C. House of Appeals of Brazil
    The House of Appeals of Brazil was a former high-level judicial body that functioned as a national court of appeal before the establishment of the modern Supreme Federal Court.
  • D. Court of Justice of Tocantins
    The Court of Justice of Tocantins is the highest judicial authority in the Brazilian state of Tocantins, responsible for overseeing state-level civil, criminal, and administrative cases.
  • E. Supreme Federal Court of Brazil
    The Supreme Federal Court of Brazil is the country’s highest judicial authority and constitutional court, responsible for interpreting the Constitution and serving as the final arbiter in major legal and political disputes.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b50b53048190ae34e8abbe3c5ada completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e7235f77708190809d6aa3ee8056aa completed April 21, 2026, 7:12 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:57 p.m.