Triple
T21139931
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bable |
E520902
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Astur-Leonese linguistic continuum |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Astur-Leonese linguistic continuum | Statement: [Bable, partOf, Astur-Leonese linguistic continuum]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Astur-Leonese linguistic continuum Context triple: [Bable, partOf, Astur-Leonese linguistic continuum]
-
A.
Occitan linguistic continuum
The Occitan linguistic continuum is a group of closely related Romance dialects spoken primarily in southern France and neighboring regions, forming a gradient of varieties rather than sharply separated languages.
-
B.
Cora linguistic continuum
The Cora linguistic continuum is a group of closely related Uto-Aztecan Cora dialects spoken in western Mexico that form a chain of mutually intelligible varieties rather than a single uniform language.
-
C.
Mono language continuum
The Mono language continuum is a group of closely related Native American languages traditionally spoken by the Mono people of central California, encompassing varieties such as Western Mono.
-
D.
Ijaw linguistic continuum
The Ijaw linguistic continuum is a group of closely related Niger-Congo languages spoken primarily by the Ijaw people in the Niger Delta region of southern Nigeria.
-
E.
Tabasaran dialect continuum
The Tabasaran dialect continuum is a group of closely related Northeast Caucasian speech varieties of the Tabasaran language, spoken primarily in southern Dagestan, Russia.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Astur-Leonese linguistic continuum Target entity description: The Astur-Leonese linguistic continuum is a group of closely related Romance dialects and languages spoken in northwestern Spain, primarily in Asturias and León, that form a gradual transition between neighboring Iberian language varieties.
-
A.
Occitan linguistic continuum
The Occitan linguistic continuum is a group of closely related Romance dialects spoken primarily in southern France and neighboring regions, forming a gradient of varieties rather than sharply separated languages.
-
B.
Cora linguistic continuum
The Cora linguistic continuum is a group of closely related Uto-Aztecan Cora dialects spoken in western Mexico that form a chain of mutually intelligible varieties rather than a single uniform language.
-
C.
Mono language continuum
The Mono language continuum is a group of closely related Native American languages traditionally spoken by the Mono people of central California, encompassing varieties such as Western Mono.
-
D.
Ijaw linguistic continuum
The Ijaw linguistic continuum is a group of closely related Niger-Congo languages spoken primarily by the Ijaw people in the Niger Delta region of southern Nigeria.
-
E.
Tabasaran dialect continuum
The Tabasaran dialect continuum is a group of closely related Northeast Caucasian speech varieties of the Tabasaran language, spoken primarily in southern Dagestan, Russia.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50b53048190ae34e8abbe3c5ada |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e7235e389881908813909e05d1413a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:57 p.m.