Triple
T21126440
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brittonic |
E520568
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Northwest Indo-European continuum |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Northwest Indo-European continuum | Statement: [Brittonic, partOf, Northwest Indo-European continuum]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Northwest Indo-European continuum Context triple: [Brittonic, partOf, Northwest Indo-European continuum]
-
A.
Nostratic hypothesis
The Nostratic hypothesis is a controversial linguistic theory proposing that several major language families of Eurasia and sometimes beyond share a common ancestral proto-language.
-
B.
Austric hypothesis
The Austric hypothesis is a proposed but controversial macro-family theory suggesting a common origin for several language families of Southeast Asia and the Pacific, including Austroasiatic and Austronesian.
-
C.
Finno-Ugric hypothesis
The Finno-Ugric hypothesis is a linguistic theory proposing that the Finno-Ugric languages share a common ancestral language and form a distinct branch within the Uralic language family.
-
D.
Italo-Celtic hypothesis
The Italo-Celtic hypothesis is a linguistic theory proposing that the Italic and Celtic branches of the Indo-European language family share a common intermediate ancestor or period of close contact, based on shared structural and lexical innovations.
-
E.
Indo-Europeans
Indo-Europeans were a Eurasian people speaking Indo-European languages whose migrations and cultural expansions gave rise to many of the major linguistic and ethnic groups across Europe and parts of Asia.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Northwest Indo-European continuum Target entity description: The Northwest Indo-European continuum is a hypothesized group of closely related early Indo-European dialects in Western and Central Europe, proposed to underlie later branches such as Celtic and possibly others.
-
A.
Nostratic hypothesis
The Nostratic hypothesis is a controversial linguistic theory proposing that several major language families of Eurasia and sometimes beyond share a common ancestral proto-language.
-
B.
Austric hypothesis
The Austric hypothesis is a proposed but controversial macro-family theory suggesting a common origin for several language families of Southeast Asia and the Pacific, including Austroasiatic and Austronesian.
-
C.
Finno-Ugric hypothesis
The Finno-Ugric hypothesis is a linguistic theory proposing that the Finno-Ugric languages share a common ancestral language and form a distinct branch within the Uralic language family.
-
D.
Italo-Celtic hypothesis
The Italo-Celtic hypothesis is a linguistic theory proposing that the Italic and Celtic branches of the Indo-European language family share a common intermediate ancestor or period of close contact, based on shared structural and lexical innovations.
-
E.
Indo-Europeans
Indo-Europeans were a Eurasian people speaking Indo-European languages whose migrations and cultural expansions gave rise to many of the major linguistic and ethnic groups across Europe and parts of Asia.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50a623881909c0bbaf4f2c055e7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e72239965c819081b4077b914d0a98 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:56 p.m.