Triple
T21126336
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer |
E520566
|
entity |
| Predicate | upgradeFor |
P142945
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 12 GeV CEBAF upgrade |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 12 GeV CEBAF upgrade | Statement: [CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer, upgradeFor, 12 GeV CEBAF upgrade]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: upgradeFor Context triple: [CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer, upgradeFor, 12 GeV CEBAF upgrade]
-
A.
upgradeOf
Indicates that one entity is a newer, improved, or more advanced version of another entity.
-
B.
upgradeType
Indicates the specific kind or category of improvement or enhancement applied to an entity relative to its previous state.
-
C.
upgradesFrom
Indicates that one entity is a newer or improved version that replaces or enhances another entity.
-
D.
upgradeGoal
Indicates that an entity has a target or intended improvement to a higher level, version, or state relative to its current condition.
-
E.
upgradeMethod
Indicates the method or process by which something is improved, updated, or elevated to a higher level or version.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50a623881909c0bbaf4f2c055e7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e72238cf708190a4676c40deea2e46 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5f5ed6c8c8190b31092a5d4c3de5d |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5f993240c8190847c0b08e65726c8 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:56 p.m.