Triple

T21124194
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Loose Box E520510 entity
Predicate hasPhysicalLocationWithin P57262 FINISHED
Object Electric Light LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Electric Light | Statement: [The Loose Box, hasPhysicalLocationWithin, Electric Light]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPhysicalLocationWithin
Context triple: [The Loose Box, hasPhysicalLocationWithin, Electric Light]
  • A. hasPhysicalLocationType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific kind or category of physical location (e.g., building type, facility type, or place type).
  • B. isPhysicalLocation
    Indicates that one entity serves as a physical, real-world place or site associated with another entity.
  • C. hasLocationRole
    Indicates that an entity holds or plays a specific role in relation to a particular location (e.g., origin, destination, storage site, or operational area).
  • D. existsWithin chosen
    Indicates that one entity is located inside the spatial, temporal, or conceptual boundaries of another entity.
  • E. likelyLocatedIn
    Indicates that an entity is probably situated within or associated with a particular location, though not with absolute certainty.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b50a623881909c0bbaf4f2c055e7 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e72237c1a4819090987c645114d452 completed April 21, 2026, 7:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5f5ed6c8c8190b31092a5d4c3de5d completed April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:56 p.m.