Triple
T21113225
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Beadle Bamford |
E520222
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWith |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Johanna Barker |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Johanna Barker | Statement: [Beadle Bamford, associatedWith, Johanna Barker]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Johanna Barker Context triple: [Beadle Bamford, associatedWith, Johanna Barker]
-
A.
Johanna Barker
chosen
Johanna Barker is the innocent and sheltered daughter of Sweeney Todd in the 2007 film adaptation of the musical thriller, serving as a central figure in the story’s themes of lost family and doomed romance.
-
B.
Maria Bicknell
Maria Bicknell was the wife of English Romantic landscape painter John Constable and a member of a well-connected Suffolk family in early 19th-century England.
-
C.
Jean Barker
Jean Barker is a journalist best known for serving as editor of the publication *The Beachcomber*.
-
D.
Frances Barker
Frances Barker was the wife of William Shirley, the 18th-century British colonial governor of Massachusetts.
-
E.
Mary Barstow
Mary Barstow was the second wife of American illustrator Norman Rockwell and the mother of his three sons.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b509a318819092fbbcb21d1fe603 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e72103b3888190a19e9a40f01fb439 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:54 p.m.