Triple

T21108415
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sassi E520111 entity
Predicate hasCounterpartIn P6587 FINISHED
Object other South Asian tragic romances LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: other South Asian tragic romances | Statement: [Sassi, hasCounterpartIn, other South Asian tragic romances]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCounterpartIn
Context triple: [Sassi, hasCounterpartIn, other South Asian tragic romances]
  • A. hasCounterpart chosen
    Indicates that one entity corresponds to, matches, or serves as an equivalent or parallel version of another entity.
  • B. hasCounterpartNameLanguage
    Indicates that an entity’s counterpart (e.g., in another context or system) has a name expressed in a specified language.
  • C. hasSmallerCounterpart
    Indicates that one entity has another entity as its corresponding version that is smaller in size, scale, or magnitude.
  • D. counterpartRelation
    Indicates a reciprocal relationship where two entities serve as corresponding or equivalent counterparts to each other in a given context.
  • E. hasCounterpartNickname
    Indicates that one entity is used as an alternative or counterpart nickname for another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b509a318819092fbbcb21d1fe603 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e720ffa998819082db225363ac3b23 completed April 21, 2026, 7:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5dbff56848190a03b350a9305c612 completed April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:54 p.m.