Triple

T21107681
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Maps and Politics E520091 entity
Predicate situatesInField P83026 FINISHED
Object political geography LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: political geography | Statement: [Maps and Politics, situatesInField, political geography]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: situatesInField
Context triple: [Maps and Politics, situatesInField, political geography]
  • A. locationOnField
    Indicates the specific position or area that an entity occupies on a defined field or playing surface.
  • B. positionInField chosen
    Indicates the specific role, location, or functional placement an entity occupies within a defined field, domain, or area of activity.
  • C. centeredOnField
    Indicates that one entity is positioned or focused around the central area of a specified field or domain.
  • D. hasInfield
    Indicates that an entity possesses or includes a designated infield area, typically within a larger spatial or structural context.
  • E. definedInField
    Indicates that something (such as a concept, method, or element) is formally specified, declared, or established within a particular field, domain, or area of study.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b509a318819092fbbcb21d1fe603 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e720fe800c81909edf215c5f1f27c2 completed April 21, 2026, 7:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5dbff56848190a03b350a9305c612 completed April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:53 p.m.