Triple
T21106005
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hurricane Epsilon |
E520044
|
entity |
| Predicate | defiedForecasts |
P142869
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Hurricane Epsilon, defiedForecasts, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defiedForecasts Context triple: [Hurricane Epsilon, defiedForecasts, true]
-
A.
defeatedDespite
Indicates that one entity successfully defeated another entity even though circumstances or expectations suggested that defeat would be unlikely or difficult.
-
B.
typeOfForecasts
Indicates the specific kinds or categories of forecasts associated with or produced by an entity.
-
C.
providesForecastFor
Indicates that one entity supplies or delivers a forecast (such as a prediction or projection) specifically concerning another entity.
-
D.
forecastUsing
Indicates that one entity generates or derives a forecast by using information, methods, or data from another entity.
-
E.
defeatedBy
Indicates that one entity has been beaten, overcome, or conquered by another in a contest, conflict, or competition.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b509a318819092fbbcb21d1fe603 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e71b62301c819082cfc6cb3cd11c8c |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbff56848190a03b350a9305c612 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5e2e03d88819086f8b641656ad8b0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:53 p.m.