Triple
T21094580
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sandra Bloom |
E519727
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToWilliamBloom |
P142824
|
FINISHED |
| Object | caring mother |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: caring mother | Statement: [Sandra Bloom, relationshipToWilliamBloom, caring mother]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToWilliamBloom Context triple: [Sandra Bloom, relationshipToWilliamBloom, caring mother]
-
A.
relationshipToEdwardBloom
Indicates the nature or type of connection an entity has to Edward Bloom, such as familial, social, or other relational ties.
-
B.
relationshipToJosephineBloom
Indicates the specific familial, social, or personal relationship that one entity has to Josephine Bloom.
-
C.
relationshipToWilbur
Indicates a specified type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Wilbur.
-
D.
relationshipToWilliamOfBaskerville
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship an entity has with William of Baskerville.
-
E.
relationshipToElizaWilliams
Indicates the specific nature of the relationship or connection that one entity has to Eliza Williams.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b508d8dc81909be940dafe36c8f7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e709517a18819081ede1d38e2c4391 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbfcd5e881908f1e4e0d2d237856 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5e2e03d88819086f8b641656ad8b0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:52 p.m.