Triple
T21093792
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Think BIG |
E519705
|
entity |
| Predicate | brandNameReferences |
P45525
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Notorious B.I.G.’s phrase “Think Big” |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Notorious B.I.G.’s phrase “Think Big” | Statement: [Think BIG, brandNameReferences, The Notorious B.I.G.’s phrase “Think Big”]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: brandNameReferences Context triple: [Think BIG, brandNameReferences, The Notorious B.I.G.’s phrase “Think Big”]
-
A.
referencesBrand
chosen
Indicates that one entity mentions, cites, or otherwise refers to a specific brand in its content or context.
-
B.
brandNameType
Indicates the specific type or category associated with a brand name within a broader branding or naming system.
-
C.
brandsAs
Indicates that one entity assigns a particular brand identity or label to another entity.
-
D.
hasBrandName
Indicates that an entity is associated with or identified by a specific brand name.
-
E.
brandNameDerivedFrom
Indicates that the brand’s name is derived from, based on, or taken from another specified name or source.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b507dd9081908fb8bfcbef4c8b46 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e709517a18819081ede1d38e2c4391 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbfcd5e881908f1e4e0d2d237856 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:51 p.m.