Triple
T21092602
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Belgian Picard |
E519672
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional variety of Picard |
C1171
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional variety of Picard Context triple: [Belgian Picard, instanceOf, regional variety of Picard]
-
A.
Oïl language
chosen
An Oïl language is any of a group of closely related Romance languages and dialects historically spoken in northern France, Belgium, and the Channel Islands, characterized by the use of "oïl" (modern "oui") for "yes."
-
B.
regional variety of Acadian French
A regional variety of Acadian French is a localized form of the French language spoken by Acadian communities, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and syntactic features shaped by historical isolation and contact with other languages.
-
C.
regional variety of the Breton language
A regional variety of the Breton language is a geographically defined form of Breton characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and sometimes grammatical features that differentiate it from other Breton dialects.
-
D.
Breton dialect
A Breton dialect is a regional variety of the Breton language characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and syntactic features specific to particular areas of Brittany.
-
E.
Franco-Provençal dialect
A Franco-Provençal dialect is a regional variety of the Gallo-Romance language continuum spoken primarily in parts of France, Switzerland, and Italy, characterized by features distinct from both standard French and Occitan.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b507dd9081908fb8bfcbef4c8b46 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:51 p.m.