Triple

T21091727
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Internet Protocol fragmentation and reassembly E519653 entity
Predicate governedBy P46 FINISHED
Object RFC 8200 NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 8200 | Statement: [Internet Protocol fragmentation and reassembly, governedBy, RFC 8200]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 8200
Context triple: [Internet Protocol fragmentation and reassembly, governedBy, RFC 8200]
  • A. RFC 8200 chosen
    RFC 8200 is the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standard that specifies the core protocol architecture and operation of Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6).
  • B. RFC 8310
    RFC 8310 is an IETF standard that specifies the use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) to provide privacy and integrity for DNS queries and responses.
  • C. RFC 2460
    RFC 2460 is the original Internet standard that specified the core IPv6 protocol header and packet format, later superseded by RFC 8200.
  • D. RFC 3491
    RFC 3491 is an Internet standard that defines the Nameprep string preparation algorithm used to normalize internationalized domain names for consistent and secure processing.
  • E. RFC 8010
    RFC 8010 is an IETF specification that defines the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) model and semantics for network printing.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b507dd9081908fb8bfcbef4c8b46 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e7094f6ebc8190a90b014755a9d4a6 completed April 21, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:51 p.m.