Triple
T21084729
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Criminal Division (Maricopa County Superior Court) |
E519456
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectTo |
P258
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Arizona Rules of Evidence |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arizona Rules of Evidence | Statement: [Criminal Division (Maricopa County Superior Court), subjectTo, Arizona Rules of Evidence]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Arizona Rules of Evidence Context triple: [Criminal Division (Maricopa County Superior Court), subjectTo, Arizona Rules of Evidence]
-
A.
Washington Rules of Evidence
The Washington Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards governing the admissibility and use of evidence in Washington State courts.
-
B.
Colorado Rules of Evidence
The Colorado Rules of Evidence are the codified standards that regulate what information may be presented and how it must be handled in Colorado state courts.
-
C.
Nevada Rules of Evidence
The Nevada Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards governing what information is admissible in Nevada courts, shaping how trials are conducted and how facts are proven.
-
D.
Arizona Supreme Court rules
The Arizona Supreme Court rules are a body of authoritative procedural and regulatory provisions issued by the state’s highest court that govern court operations, attorney conduct, and judicial discipline in Arizona.
-
E.
Arizona Session Laws
Arizona Session Laws are the official chronological compilation of all laws and resolutions enacted by the Arizona Legislature during a given legislative session.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Arizona Rules of Evidence Target entity description: The Arizona Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards governing what information may be presented and considered in Arizona courts during judicial proceedings.
-
A.
Washington Rules of Evidence
The Washington Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards governing the admissibility and use of evidence in Washington State courts.
-
B.
Colorado Rules of Evidence
The Colorado Rules of Evidence are the codified standards that regulate what information may be presented and how it must be handled in Colorado state courts.
-
C.
Nevada Rules of Evidence
The Nevada Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards governing what information is admissible in Nevada courts, shaping how trials are conducted and how facts are proven.
-
D.
Arizona Supreme Court rules
The Arizona Supreme Court rules are a body of authoritative procedural and regulatory provisions issued by the state’s highest court that govern court operations, attorney conduct, and judicial discipline in Arizona.
-
E.
Arizona Session Laws
Arizona Session Laws are the official chronological compilation of all laws and resolutions enacted by the Arizona Legislature during a given legislative session.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b507dd9081908fb8bfcbef4c8b46 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e709498fc081908d92a93e8678c140 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:49 p.m.