Triple

T21084728
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Criminal Division (Maricopa County Superior Court) E519456 entity
Predicate subjectTo P258 FINISHED
Object Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure | Statement: [Criminal Division (Maricopa County Superior Court), subjectTo, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure
Context triple: [Criminal Division (Maricopa County Superior Court), subjectTo, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure]
  • A. Oregon Rules of Criminal Procedure
    The Oregon Rules of Criminal Procedure are the statewide legal rules that govern how criminal cases are processed and adjudicated in Oregon’s courts.
  • B. Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure
    The Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure are the formal procedural rules that regulate how criminal cases are initiated, conducted, and resolved in Colorado’s state courts.
  • C. Nevada Rules of Criminal Procedure
    The Nevada Rules of Criminal Procedure are a body of court rules that govern how criminal cases are initiated, conducted, and resolved in Nevada’s state courts.
  • D. Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure
    The Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure are the statewide procedural rules that govern how civil lawsuits are filed, conducted, and resolved in Oregon’s state courts.
  • E. Kansas Rules of Criminal Procedure
    The Kansas Rules of Criminal Procedure are the statewide legal rules that govern how criminal cases are processed and adjudicated in Kansas courts, from charging and pretrial motions through trial and appeal.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure
Target entity description: The Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure are the statewide legal rules that govern how criminal cases are processed and adjudicated in Arizona’s courts.
  • A. Oregon Rules of Criminal Procedure
    The Oregon Rules of Criminal Procedure are the statewide legal rules that govern how criminal cases are processed and adjudicated in Oregon’s courts.
  • B. Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure
    The Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure are the formal procedural rules that regulate how criminal cases are initiated, conducted, and resolved in Colorado’s state courts.
  • C. Nevada Rules of Criminal Procedure
    The Nevada Rules of Criminal Procedure are a body of court rules that govern how criminal cases are initiated, conducted, and resolved in Nevada’s state courts.
  • D. Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure
    The Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure are the statewide procedural rules that govern how civil lawsuits are filed, conducted, and resolved in Oregon’s state courts.
  • E. Kansas Rules of Criminal Procedure
    The Kansas Rules of Criminal Procedure are the statewide legal rules that govern how criminal cases are processed and adjudicated in Kansas courts, from charging and pretrial motions through trial and appeal.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b507dd9081908fb8bfcbef4c8b46 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e709498fc081908d92a93e8678c140 completed April 21, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:49 p.m.