Triple
T21077394
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory of the Earth |
E519273
|
entity |
| Predicate | scientificPerspective |
P3464
|
FINISHED |
| Object | uniformitarianism in geology |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: uniformitarianism in geology | Statement: [Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory of the Earth, scientificPerspective, uniformitarianism in geology]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: scientificPerspective Context triple: [Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory of the Earth, scientificPerspective, uniformitarianism in geology]
-
A.
scientificResearch
Indicates that an entity conducts, participates in, or is the subject of systematic scientific investigation or study.
-
B.
scientificAuthority
Indicates that one entity is recognized as an expert or authoritative source in scientific matters relative to another entity or context.
-
C.
scholarlyView
chosen
Indicates that one entity holds an academic or research-based interpretation, opinion, or theoretical stance about another entity.
-
D.
scientificConsensus
Indicates that there is broad agreement among qualified experts or authoritative sources that a particular claim, finding, or theory is valid.
-
E.
consideredByScience
Indicates that something is regarded, evaluated, or treated as valid or relevant within the framework, methods, or consensus of scientific inquiry.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b506e59c8190849b71ed07929215 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e702d77b8081908ecfb05ab391fd39 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbfcd5e881908f1e4e0d2d237856 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:49 p.m.