Triple
T21068044
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bartholomew and the Oobleck |
E519026
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPageColorScheme |
P29272
|
FINISHED |
| Object | limited color palette emphasizing green |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: limited color palette emphasizing green | Statement: [Bartholomew and the Oobleck, hasPageColorScheme, limited color palette emphasizing green]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPageColorScheme Context triple: [Bartholomew and the Oobleck, hasPageColorScheme, limited color palette emphasizing green]
-
A.
hasColourScheme
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular set or pattern of colors used in its design or appearance.
-
B.
hasColorModel
Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular color representation model (such as RGB, CMYK, or HSV) for defining its colors.
-
C.
hasColorStructure
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific arrangement or pattern of colors.
-
D.
hasColorInfo
Indicates that an entity is associated with specific color-related information or attributes.
-
E.
hasColorOption
Indicates that an entity offers or supports a particular color as one of its selectable options.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b505ef108190b25dd4033e2ff7eb |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6feb5772481909e32af3b3a69df76 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbf9d71881908cd85dfc37db93ca |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:45 p.m.