Triple
T21059937
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edmund Randolph as Attorney General |
E518822
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalOpinionsIssuedOn |
P142690
|
FINISHED |
| Object | scope of executive power |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: scope of executive power | Statement: [Edmund Randolph as Attorney General, legalOpinionsIssuedOn, scope of executive power]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalOpinionsIssuedOn Context triple: [Edmund Randolph as Attorney General, legalOpinionsIssuedOn, scope of executive power]
-
A.
legalOpinionsUsedIn
Indicates that certain legal opinions are referenced or relied upon within a particular legal case, document, or context.
-
B.
legalCodeFocus
Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, centered on, or primarily addressing a particular legal code or body of law.
-
C.
givesLegalOpinionTo
Indicates that one party provides a formal legal judgment, advice, or interpretation to another party.
-
D.
legalTool
Indicates a relationship where something functions as a legal instrument, mechanism, or means used to achieve or regulate a legal purpose or outcome.
-
E.
unpublishedOpinionsAre
Indicates that certain opinions or judgments have not been formally published or made publicly available.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b505ef108190b25dd4033e2ff7eb |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6fd842e8881909f4ffc4c43b7fa9f |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbf9d71881908cd85dfc37db93ca |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5e2e03d88819086f8b641656ad8b0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:37 p.m.