Triple
T21059454
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Epirotes |
E518811
|
entity |
| Predicate | conquestDateApproximate |
P26883
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2nd century BCE |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2nd century BCE | Statement: [Epirotes, conquestDateApproximate, 2nd century BCE]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conquestDateApproximate Context triple: [Epirotes, conquestDateApproximate, 2nd century BCE]
-
A.
conquestYear
Indicates the year in which one entity successfully conquered or took control over another entity.
-
B.
conquestPeriod
chosen
Indicates the time span during which one entity successfully subjugates or takes control of another through conquest.
-
C.
afterConquestBy
Indicates that one entity exists in a state, condition, or situation that occurs subsequent to and as a result of being conquered by another entity.
-
D.
conquestEvent
Indicates an event in which one party gains control over another entity or territory through force or domination.
-
E.
conqueredIn
Indicates that one entity gained control over another entity or territory as a result of a specific conquest event or campaign.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b5053ac48190921529544959e906 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6fd842e8881909f4ffc4c43b7fa9f |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbf9d71881908cd85dfc37db93ca |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:37 p.m.