Triple

T21059324
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Phoenice E518808 entity
Predicate hasArchaeologicalParkStatus P142678 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Phoenice, hasArchaeologicalParkStatus, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasArchaeologicalParkStatus
Context triple: [Phoenice, hasArchaeologicalParkStatus, yes]
  • A. hasArchaeologicalSiteStatus
    Indicates that an entity holds an officially recognized status or designation as an archaeological site.
  • B. hasArchaeologicalSiteIn
    Indicates that an entity possesses, contains, or is associated with an archaeological site located within a specified place or region.
  • C. isArchaeologicalSite
    Indicates that a location or structure is recognized as an archaeological site, typically due to its historical or cultural remains of past human activity.
  • D. hasArchaeologicalSitesFrom
    Indicates that an entity contains or is associated with archaeological sites dating from a specified time period or era.
  • E. hasArchaeologicalSiteType
    Indicates that an entity is classified as, or associated with, a specific type or category of archaeological site.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b5053ac48190921529544959e906 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6fd842e8881909f4ffc4c43b7fa9f completed April 21, 2026, 4:31 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5dbf9d71881908cd85dfc37db93ca completed April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5e2e03d88819086f8b641656ad8b0 completed April 20, 2026, 8:25 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:37 p.m.