Triple

T21054038
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tana River County E518662 entity
Predicate borders P224 FINISHED
Object Kitui County NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kitui County | Statement: [Tana River County, borders, Kitui County]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kitui County
Context triple: [Tana River County, borders, Kitui County]
  • A. Kitui County chosen
    Kitui County is a semi-arid administrative region in eastern Kenya known for its rural economy, coal deposits, and location between the coastal and central highland areas.
  • B. Kiambu County
    Kiambu County is a largely peri-urban and agricultural county in central Kenya, bordering Nairobi and forming part of the greater Nairobi metropolitan area.
  • C. Kisumu County
    Kisumu County is a county in western Kenya along Lake Victoria, known as a major economic and political hub and the location of the city of Kisumu.
  • D. Nyandarua County
    Nyandarua County is an administrative region in central Kenya known for its highland agriculture and proximity to the Aberdare Range.
  • E. Nakuru County
    Nakuru County is a region in Kenya’s Rift Valley known for its lakes, wildlife, and agricultural activities.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b5053ac48190921529544959e906 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6fd7e087c81908712ddc63e8b1e6c completed April 21, 2026, 4:30 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:36 p.m.