Triple

T21053055
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Destination Gotland E518636 entity
Predicate connectsCity P4245 FINISHED
Object Oskarshamn NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Oskarshamn | Statement: [Destination Gotland, connectsCity, Oskarshamn]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Oskarshamn
Context triple: [Destination Gotland, connectsCity, Oskarshamn]
  • A. Oskarshamn chosen
    Oskarshamn is a coastal town in southeastern Sweden known for its Baltic Sea harbor and proximity to the island of Gotland.
  • B. Karlshamn
    Karlshamn is a coastal town in southern Sweden known for its harbor, archipelago, and role as a regional industrial and transport hub.
  • C. Eskilstuna
    Eskilstuna is an industrial city in central Sweden known historically for its metalworking and engineering industries.
  • D. Söderhamn
    Söderhamn is a coastal town in east-central Sweden known for its historical wooden architecture and role as the administrative and commercial center of the surrounding region.
  • E. Fagersta
    Fagersta is an industrial town in central Sweden known for its steel production and manufacturing heritage.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b5053ac48190921529544959e906 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6fd7cabe881909e6b258a14d501a6 completed April 21, 2026, 4:30 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:36 p.m.