Triple
T21046915
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ISO(n) |
E518472
|
entity |
| Predicate | normalSubgroup |
P63683
|
FINISHED |
| Object | R^n |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: R^n | Statement: [ISO(n), normalSubgroup, R^n]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: normalSubgroup Context triple: [ISO(n), normalSubgroup, R^n]
-
A.
hasNormalSubgroup
chosen
Indicates that one group is a normal subgroup of another group, meaning it is invariant under conjugation by elements of the larger group.
-
B.
isCharacteristicInEveryNormalSubgroup
Indicates that a subgroup remains invariant under every automorphism of each normal subgroup of the group.
-
C.
derivedSubgroup
Indicates that one group is the derived (commutator) subgroup of another, generated by all commutators of its elements.
-
D.
isCharacteristicSubgroup
Indicates that one subgroup is invariant under all automorphisms of the parent group, making it a characteristic subgroup of that group.
-
E.
isFullyInvariantSubgroup
Indicates that a subgroup remains invariant under all endomorphisms of the parent group, not just its automorphisms.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50438e08190917e2538bb8bc034 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6fcf4d26481908b639996500a8319 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbf6728881908a2a43a5c8804a2a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:34 p.m.