Triple
T21041545
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | My Friends |
E518336
|
entity |
| Predicate | sungTo |
P104193
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sweeney Todd's razors |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sweeney Todd's razors | Statement: [My Friends, sungTo, Sweeney Todd's razors]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sungTo Context triple: [My Friends, sungTo, Sweeney Todd's razors]
-
A.
sungIn
Indicates that something (such as a song, lyric, or performance) is performed vocally using a particular language, style, or vocal context.
-
B.
sungAs
Indicates that something is performed or vocalized in the manner, role, or identity specified by another entity (e.g., a song or part being sung as a particular character, style, or version).
-
C.
isSungBy
Indicates that a song, piece of music, or vocal performance is performed vocally by a particular singer or group of singers.
-
D.
sungDuring
Indicates that one entity is sung during the time span or occurrence of another event or activity.
-
E.
singsTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity performs singing directed toward or for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50438e08190917e2538bb8bc034 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6fcefe4688190ad1bed1ef2d7a3e5 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbf6728881908a2a43a5c8804a2a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:15 p.m.