Triple
T21039895
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pecora hearings on Wall Street practices |
E518292
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | financial scandal investigation |
C5265
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: financial scandal investigation Context triple: [Pecora hearings on Wall Street practices, instanceOf, financial scandal investigation]
-
A.
financial scandal
chosen
A financial scandal is a widely publicized incident in which individuals or organizations engage in unethical, illegal, or deceptive financial practices that result in significant economic harm, loss of trust, or legal consequences.
-
B.
accounting scandal
An accounting scandal is a situation in which a company or organization intentionally manipulates or falsifies financial records to mislead stakeholders about its true financial performance or condition.
-
C.
criminal scandal
A criminal scandal is a widely publicized incident in which illegal or morally corrupt actions by individuals or organizations are exposed, often leading to public outrage, legal consequences, and reputational damage.
-
D.
anti-corruption investigation
An anti-corruption investigation is a systematic inquiry conducted to uncover, document, and address instances of bribery, fraud, abuse of power, or other corrupt practices within public or private institutions.
-
E.
legal scandal
A legal scandal is a widely publicized controversy arising from alleged or proven violations of law or ethical standards by individuals or organizations, often involving misconduct, corruption, or abuse of power.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50438e08190917e2538bb8bc034 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:14 p.m.