Triple
T21027508
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alba Trueba |
E517977
|
entity |
| Predicate | generationInFamily |
P96348
|
FINISHED |
| Object | third generation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: third generation | Statement: [Alba Trueba, generationInFamily, third generation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: generationInFamily Context triple: [Alba Trueba, generationInFamily, third generation]
-
A.
familyOf
Indicates a familial relationship exists between the entities, such as by blood, marriage, or adoption.
-
B.
partOfGeneration
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a component, member, or subset of a particular generation or generational group associated with another entity.
-
C.
developedFamily
Indicates that one entity created, advanced, or significantly contributed to the formation or growth of a particular family group or familial line.
-
D.
generationOf
Indicates that one entity is the origin, creator, or producer of another entity.
-
E.
createdForFamilyOf
Indicates that something was created or produced specifically for the benefit, use, or needs of a particular family or family group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b503275c8190afd9a163f997c709 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6fc7d93908190a2c29a4051fb5acc |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbf274ac81909bbf245627dc8fdc |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 1:55 p.m.