Triple
T21004616
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | E minor |
E517381
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHarmonicMinorVariant |
P142447
|
FINISHED |
| Object | E harmonic minor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: E harmonic minor | Statement: [E minor, hasHarmonicMinorVariant, E harmonic minor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHarmonicMinorVariant Context triple: [E minor, hasHarmonicMinorVariant, E harmonic minor]
-
A.
enharmonicEquivalent
Indicates that two musical notes, intervals, or keys sound the same in pitch but are written differently in notation.
-
B.
usesHarmonics
Indicates that one entity employs harmonic frequencies or overtones of another entity or signal as part of its operation or behavior.
-
C.
hasHarmony
Indicates that two or more entities are in a state of balance, agreement, or pleasing coordination with one another.
-
D.
usesChordChangesOf
Indicates that one musical work employs the same or substantially similar chord progression as another work.
-
E.
isChromatic
Indicates that something exhibits chromatic properties, such as involving or characterized by multiple colors or tones.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50192308190a284fcc89dd23a49 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6fc3b25ec8190aa4530d1f0bb2b9e |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbec80708190a49bccab7ff97e7b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5e2df1a888190b5b478e76bdf7fdf |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 1:52 p.m.