Triple

T21002470
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject province of Södermanland E517328 entity
Predicate containsCity P294 FINISHED
Object Gnesta NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gnesta | Statement: [province of Södermanland, containsCity, Gnesta]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gnesta
Context triple: [province of Södermanland, containsCity, Gnesta]
  • A. Gnesta chosen
    Gnesta is a small town in Södermanland County, Sweden, known for its lakeside setting and role as a local commercial and transport hub.
  • B. Strängnäs
    Strängnäs is a historic Swedish town known for its medieval cathedral and picturesque location on the shores of Lake Mälaren.
  • C. Gnesta Municipality
    Gnesta Municipality is a local government area in Södermanland County, Sweden, known for its small-town character, lakes, and proximity to the Stockholm region.
  • D. Stavsnäs
    Stavsnäs is a coastal village and locality in Värmdö Municipality in Stockholm County, Sweden, known as a key ferry and boating hub in the Stockholm archipelago.
  • E. Ronneby
    Ronneby is a historic town in southern Sweden known for its well-preserved wooden architecture, spa traditions, and scenic location in Blekinge County.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b50192308190a284fcc89dd23a49 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6fc38b8688190860fba1b58e1b3e6 completed April 21, 2026, 4:25 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 1:52 p.m.