Triple

T20994266
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Adelaide’s Lament E517104 entity
Predicate isNumberInAct P142399 FINISHED
Object Act I (typical staging) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Act I (typical staging) | Statement: [Adelaide’s Lament, isNumberInAct, Act I (typical staging)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isNumberInAct
Context triple: [Adelaide’s Lament, isNumberInAct, Act I (typical staging)]
  • A. hasNumberInActa
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific identifying number recorded in an official acta (formal record or document).
  • B. isAt
    Indicates that one entity is located at or present in the place or position of another entity.
  • C. positionInAct
    Indicates the specific location or role that something occupies within a particular act or segment of a larger sequence or performance.
  • D. activeInBand
    Indicates that an entity is a current member performing or participating in the activities of a specific band.
  • E. isActually
    Indicates that something is in fact a particular way or identity, often clarifying or correcting a previous or apparent understanding.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b5006e2881909fc2383f841740cc completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6fc1e75188190a97114238ea0b4f9 completed April 21, 2026, 4:25 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5dbec80708190a49bccab7ff97e7b completed April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5e2df1a888190b5b478e76bdf7fdf completed April 20, 2026, 8:25 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 1:50 p.m.