Triple
T20989856
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Charles Fleetwood |
E516990
|
entity |
| Predicate | afterRestoration |
P142383
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lived in relative obscurity |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lived in relative obscurity | Statement: [Charles Fleetwood, afterRestoration, lived in relative obscurity]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: afterRestoration Context triple: [Charles Fleetwood, afterRestoration, lived in relative obscurity]
-
A.
laterRestored
Indicates that something previously altered, damaged, or removed was subsequently brought back to its earlier state or condition.
-
B.
areaRestoredOn
Indicates that a specified amount or portion of area has been restored on a particular date, event, or restoration action.
-
C.
hasRestoration
Indicates that an entity has undergone, is undergoing, or is associated with a process of repair, renewal, or restoration.
-
D.
hasBeenRestored
Indicates that an entity has been returned to a previous or original state after damage, loss, or alteration.
-
E.
attemptedRestoration
Indicates an action where an entity makes an effort to restore or return another entity to a previous or desired state, condition, or form, regardless of whether the restoration succeeds.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4ffac148190bbade9f0eceb660b |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6fbe5f49c8190a5c031eceba9ebf7 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbec80708190a49bccab7ff97e7b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5e2df1a888190b5b478e76bdf7fdf |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 1:49 p.m.