Triple
T20984007
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Salanio |
E516844
|
entity |
| Predicate | providesCommentaryOn |
P21592
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Antonio’s financial ventures |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Antonio’s financial ventures | Statement: [Salanio, providesCommentaryOn, Antonio’s financial ventures]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: providesCommentaryOn Context triple: [Salanio, providesCommentaryOn, Antonio’s financial ventures]
-
A.
hasCommentaryOn
Indicates that one entity provides commentary, explanation, or evaluative remarks about another entity.
-
B.
commentaryOn
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides evaluative or explanatory remarks about another entity, such as a work, event, or statement.
-
C.
hasCommentaryIn
Indicates that an entity is discussed, analyzed, or annotated within a specific commentary work or source.
-
D.
hasCommentaryForm
Indicates that one entity exists in, or is associated with, a commentary version or format of another entity.
-
E.
typeOfCommentary
Indicates that one piece of commentary is a specific kind or subtype of another, more general category of commentary.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4ffac148190bbade9f0eceb660b |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6fbe1474c8190912b90da0973f99f |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbec80708190a49bccab7ff97e7b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 1:48 p.m.