Triple

T20975925
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Zeta Canis Majoris E516623 entity
Predicate hasFutureEvolution P131358 FINISHED
Object will evolve into giant star LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: will evolve into giant star | Statement: [Zeta Canis Majoris, hasFutureEvolution, will evolve into giant star]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFutureEvolution
Context triple: [Zeta Canis Majoris, hasFutureEvolution, will evolve into giant star]
  • A. eventualEvolution chosen
    Indicates that one entity will, over time or through a series of changes, develop into or be transformed into another entity.
  • B. hasMegaEvolution
    Indicates that an entity possesses a special evolved form known as a Mega Evolution.
  • C. evolvesIn
    Indicates that an entity undergoes a process of change or development within a specified environment, context, or medium.
  • D. evolvesAtLevel
    Indicates the specific experience level at which one entity transforms or progresses into another form.
  • E. laterEvolvedIntoName
    Indicates that one entity, typically an earlier form or version, subsequently developed or transformed into another entity identified by a later name.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4fee5ac8190875fa9ceba1a5e5e completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6fba3df2081908c1db5f8610ba43d completed April 21, 2026, 4:23 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5dbe6976081908abd4e9c8734bae9 completed April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 1:46 p.m.