Triple
T20971634
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Epsilon Microscopii |
E516512
|
entity |
| Predicate | bayerDesignation |
P24821
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ε Microscopii |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ε Microscopii | Statement: [Epsilon Microscopii, bayerDesignation, ε Microscopii]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: ε Microscopii Context triple: [Epsilon Microscopii, bayerDesignation, ε Microscopii]
-
A.
Gamma Muscae
Gamma Muscae is a bright B-type giant star in the southern constellation Musca, visible to the naked eye and notable as one of the constellation’s primary stellar members.
-
B.
Gamma Microscopii
chosen
Gamma Microscopii is a yellow giant star in the southern constellation Microscopium, notable as its most luminous visible member.
-
C.
Leo Minor
Leo Minor is a small, faint constellation in the northern sky located between Ursa Major and Leo.
-
D.
Microscopium
Microscopium is a small, faint constellation in the southern sky, representing a microscope and introduced in the 18th century by the astronomer Nicolas-Louis de Lacaille.
-
E.
Lambda Muscae
Lambda Muscae is a relatively faint main-sequence star located in the southern constellation Musca.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4fee5ac8190875fa9ceba1a5e5e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6fba027708190a49e95b0031d980d |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 1:44 p.m.