Triple

T20967568
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject LAU E516408 entity
Predicate legalBasisInEU P142286 FINISHED
Object EU regulations on regional statistics LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: EU regulations on regional statistics | Statement: [LAU, legalBasisInEU, EU regulations on regional statistics]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalBasisInEU
Context triple: [LAU, legalBasisInEU, EU regulations on regional statistics]
  • A. legalBasis
    Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
  • B. legalStandingBasis
    Indicates the legal grounds or justification on which a party’s standing or authority in a legal matter is based.
  • C. legalStatusInEuropeanUnion
    Indicates the legal status or standing that an entity holds within the jurisdictional framework of the European Union.
  • D. legalBasisForExecution
    Indicates that one entity serves as the legal justification or authority for carrying out the execution of another entity or action.
  • E. hasLegalBasisSince
    Indicates that something has had a valid legal foundation or authority starting from a specified point in time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4fde6c48190af1398e7e734629e completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6fb9d6b548190af7214ad2468cfbf completed April 21, 2026, 4:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5dbe6976081908abd4e9c8734bae9 completed April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5e2df1a888190b5b478e76bdf7fdf completed April 20, 2026, 8:25 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 1:37 p.m.