Triple
T20954603
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Caitaani Mutharaba-Ini |
E516066
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gikuyu-language literary work |
C44123
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Gikuyu-language literary work Context triple: [Caitaani Mutharaba-Ini, instanceOf, Gikuyu-language literary work]
-
A.
regional variety of Kikuyu language
A regional variety of the Kikuyu language is a geographically defined form of Kikuyu characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and sometimes grammatical features shared by speakers in a particular area.
-
B.
Kikongo dialect
A Kikongo dialect is a regional or social variety of the Kikongo language characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features shared by a specific speech community.
-
C.
Nilotic language
A Nilotic language is a member of a group of related languages spoken primarily along the Nile Valley and surrounding regions of East Africa, characterized by shared grammatical and phonological features.
-
D.
Nilotic language
A Nilotic language is a member of a group of related languages spoken primarily along the Nile Valley and surrounding regions of East Africa, characterized by shared grammatical structures and vocabulary.
-
E.
Ubangian language
A Ubangian language is a member of a proposed group of Central African languages, primarily spoken in the Central African Republic and neighboring countries, that share common phonological and grammatical features and are often considered a branch of the Niger-Congo family.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4fcd678819087a304291f14330a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 1:28 p.m.