Triple

T20949884
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs E515948 entity
Predicate canConstitute P141825 FINISHED
Object sub-committees for specific parliamentary issues LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sub-committees for specific parliamentary issues | Statement: [Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs, canConstitute, sub-committees for specific parliamentary issues]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canConstitute
Context triple: [Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs, canConstitute, sub-committees for specific parliamentary issues]
  • A. canBe
    Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
  • B. canMake
    Indicates that one entity has the ability or capacity to create, produce, or assemble another entity.
  • C. canElect
    Indicates that one entity has the authority or ability to choose another entity for a position, role, or office through an election process.
  • D. canConcurIn
    Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to agree with, coincide with, or participate jointly in the same event, decision, or condition as another entity.
  • E. canConclude
    Indicates that one entity is able to logically derive or reach a conclusion about another entity or situation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4fcd678819087a304291f14330a completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6fadd3bd88190a0d1fdea9d300fc0 completed April 21, 2026, 4:19 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5c9b1bae48190a845165fed1b005e completed April 20, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5d53d22d08190bc17ed4bed53804a completed April 20, 2026, 7:26 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 1:18 p.m.