Triple

T20931309
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Siyavash E515476 entity
Predicate provesInnocenceBy P141732 FINISHED
Object trial by fire LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trial by fire | Statement: [Siyavash, provesInnocenceBy, trial by fire]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: provesInnocenceBy
Context triple: [Siyavash, provesInnocenceBy, trial by fire]
  • A. worksToProveInnocenceOf
    Indicates that one entity actively engages in efforts or actions aimed at demonstrating or establishing the innocence of another entity.
  • B. actuallyInnocentOf
    Indicates that an entity is truly not responsible for or did not commit the action, offense, or wrongdoing in question, regardless of prior accusations or judgments.
  • C. acquittedBy
    Indicates that an entity was formally cleared of charges or blame through a decision or judgment made by another entity.
  • D. acquittedOf
    Indicates that an authority has formally cleared an entity of a specific charge, accusation, or wrongdoing.
  • E. convictedBy
    Indicates that an authority, typically a court or judge, has formally found an entity guilty of a crime or offense.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4fb431c8190b9d40e6a72f0cc87 completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6f6557e4881909ce932c3f538304a completed April 21, 2026, 4 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5c9af1fe08190953366a466950140 completed April 20, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5d53d22d08190bc17ed4bed53804a completed April 20, 2026, 7:26 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:49 p.m.