Triple

T20929361
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gouveio E515426 entity
Predicate hasSynonymConfusion P2289 FINISHED
Object similarity of name to Verdelho LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: similarity of name to Verdelho | Statement: [Gouveio, hasSynonymConfusion, similarity of name to Verdelho]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSynonymConfusion
Context triple: [Gouveio, hasSynonymConfusion, similarity of name to Verdelho]
  • A. isNotSynonymOf
    Indicates that two terms or expressions do not share the same or sufficiently similar meaning and therefore are not synonyms of each other.
  • B. oftenConfusedWith chosen
    Indicates that one entity is frequently mistaken for or thought to be another due to similarity or ambiguity.
  • C. hasDisambiguationNote
    Indicates that there is an explanatory note used to distinguish this entity or term from other entities or terms with similar or identical names.
  • D. synonym
    Indicates that two terms have the same or nearly the same meaning in a given context.
  • E. hasMultipleMeanings
    Indicates that a term, symbol, or expression is associated with more than one distinct meaning or interpretation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4fb431c8190b9d40e6a72f0cc87 completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6f6545f8c81908a8c2f0e8d7b060e completed April 21, 2026, 4 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5c9af1fe08190953366a466950140 completed April 20, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:49 p.m.