Triple
T20926341
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Awabakal |
E515353
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDocumentedLanguageWork |
P43659
|
FINISHED |
| Object | An Australian Grammar of the Language, as Spoken by the Aborigines of the Hunter River, Lake Macquarie, &c. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: An Australian Grammar of the Language, as Spoken by the Aborigines of the Hunter River, Lake Macquarie, &c. | Statement: [Awabakal, hasDocumentedLanguageWork, An Australian Grammar of the Language, as Spoken by the Aborigines of the Hunter River, Lake Macquarie, &c.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: An Australian Grammar of the Language, as Spoken by the Aborigines of the Hunter River, Lake Macquarie, &c. Context triple: [Awabakal, hasDocumentedLanguageWork, An Australian Grammar of the Language, as Spoken by the Aborigines of the Hunter River, Lake Macquarie, &c.]
-
A.
An Australian Grammar of the Language, as Spoken by the Aborigines, in the Vicinity of Hunter’s River, Lake Macquarie, &c.
chosen
"An Australian Grammar of the Language, as Spoken by the Aborigines, in the Vicinity of Hunter’s River, Lake Macquarie, &c." is a 19th-century grammatical description and vocabulary of the Awabakal Aboriginal language of New South Wales, Australia.
-
B.
Arnhem Land linguistic area
The Arnhem Land linguistic area is a region in northern Australia characterized by a group of Aboriginal languages that share extensive structural and lexical features due to long-term contact and cultural interaction.
-
C.
Yolngu Matha
Yolngu Matha is a group of closely related Indigenous Australian languages spoken by the Yolngu people of northeastern Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory.
-
D.
Dyirbal language
Dyirbal language is an Australian Aboriginal language traditionally spoken in northeastern Queensland, noted for its complex noun class system and distinctive grammatical structures.
-
E.
Bininj Kunwok dialect continuum
The Bininj Kunwok dialect continuum is a group of closely related Aboriginal languages spoken by Bininj people in western Arnhem Land in Australia, encompassing several mutually intelligible dialects such as Kunwinjku.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDocumentedLanguageWork Context triple: [Awabakal, hasDocumentedLanguageWork, An Australian Grammar of the Language, as Spoken by the Aborigines of the Hunter River, Lake Macquarie, &c.]
-
A.
hasWorkedInLanguage
Indicates that an entity has performed work or professional activities using a particular language.
-
B.
hasLinguisticDocumentation
chosen
Indicates that there exists recorded linguistic information or documentation about the language or linguistic properties of the subject.
-
C.
hasWorkedOnLanguageFamily
Indicates that an entity (such as a person or organization) has conducted work, research, or professional activity related to a particular language family.
-
D.
hasOfficialLanguageOfWork
Indicates that an entity uses a specified language as its official medium for conducting work or formal activities.
-
E.
usesWorkingLanguagesOf
Indicates that one entity employs or operates using the working languages associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4fb431c8190b9d40e6a72f0cc87 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6f65200b08190ac208204a20f5a6a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c9af1fe08190953366a466950140 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:49 p.m.