Triple
T2091728
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Secretary of State of California |
E32684
|
entity |
| Predicate | style |
P87
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mister Secretary |
E1319
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mister Secretary | Statement: [Secretary of State of California, style, Mister Secretary]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mister Secretary Context triple: [Secretary of State of California, style, Mister Secretary]
-
A.
Mister Secretary
Mister Secretary is a gender-reversed counterpart concept to the political drama series "Madam Secretary," imagining a male lead in a similar high-level government role.
-
B.
Mr. Secretary
chosen
Mr. Secretary is the formal style of address traditionally used for the United States Secretary of Defense.
-
C.
Mr. Secretary
"Mr. Secretary" is the formal style of address traditionally used for the United States Secretary of Transportation.
-
D.
Mr. Secretary
"Mr. Secretary" is the formal style of address traditionally used for the United States Secretary of State.
-
E.
Mr. Secretary
"Mr. Secretary" is the traditional formal style of address used for the United States Secretary of the Treasury.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885eba0708190999696a45cbec816 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abba7626d081908c9c0f18942e128d |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:41 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ae2746fb3481909e0b7fdbd4748245 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 1:49 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:43 p.m.