Triple
T20896696
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Master Agreement on Apportionment |
E514556
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | interprovincial water-sharing agreement |
C8918
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: interprovincial water-sharing agreement Context triple: [Master Agreement on Apportionment, instanceOf, interprovincial water-sharing agreement]
-
A.
water resources management agreement
chosen
A water resources management agreement is a formal arrangement between parties that defines rights, responsibilities, and coordinated actions for the sustainable allocation, use, protection, and monitoring of shared water resources.
-
B.
interstate boundary river
An interstate boundary river is a natural watercourse whose channel or thalweg forms all or part of the legal border between two or more states or equivalent political jurisdictions.
-
C.
cross-border lake
A cross-border lake is a body of water whose surface and/or basin is geographically shared and jointly influenced by two or more sovereign countries.
-
D.
water transfer project
A water transfer project is a large-scale infrastructure system designed to move water from regions of surplus to regions of deficit through canals, pipelines, tunnels, and related facilities to meet agricultural, industrial, and domestic needs.
-
E.
international agreement
An international agreement is a formal, negotiated arrangement between two or more sovereign states or international organizations that creates binding obligations under international law.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4f7ebe48190952a85547a0f31a1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:47 p.m.