Triple
T20889617
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Astyanax |
E514373
|
entity |
| Predicate | otherNameMeaning |
P78862
|
FINISHED |
| Object | name related to the river Scamander |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: name related to the river Scamander | Statement: [Astyanax, otherNameMeaning, name related to the river Scamander]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: otherNameMeaning Context triple: [Astyanax, otherNameMeaning, name related to the river Scamander]
-
A.
currentNameMeaning
Indicates that the predicate expresses the meaning or significance of an entity’s current name.
-
B.
alternativeNameMeaning
chosen
Indicates that one entity expresses the meaning or interpretation of an alternative name used for another entity.
-
C.
birthNameMeaning
Indicates the semantic meaning or significance associated with a person's birth name.
-
D.
languageNameMeaning
Indicates that the predicate relates a language’s name to its meaning or etymological significance.
-
E.
nameMeaningLanguage
Indicates that a specified meaning of a name is expressed or interpreted in a particular language.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4f7ebe48190952a85547a0f31a1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6d05d591481908c9c999db76760fc |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c9a8dc148190b33ff51894e2a8f9 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:46 p.m.