Triple
T20889489
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | fall of Jupiter |
E514370
|
entity |
| Predicate | equivalentMythologicalName |
P141581
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fall of Zeus |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fall of Zeus | Statement: [fall of Jupiter, equivalentMythologicalName, fall of Zeus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: equivalentMythologicalName Context triple: [fall of Jupiter, equivalentMythologicalName, fall of Zeus]
-
A.
equivalentInRomanMythology
Indicates that one entity corresponds to or is identified as the Roman-mythology counterpart of another entity from a different mythological tradition.
-
B.
hasMythologicalNamesake
Indicates that one entity is named after, or shares its name with, a figure or element from mythology.
-
C.
equivalentInGreekReligion
Indicates that two religious figures, concepts, or practices are counterparts or direct analogues of each other within the context of Greek religion.
-
D.
linkedToMythology
Indicates that something has a connection or association with a mythological tradition, figure, story, or theme.
-
E.
comparableDeity
Indicates that one deity is considered comparable to another in terms of role, attributes, status, or function.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4f7ebe48190952a85547a0f31a1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6d05d591481908c9c999db76760fc |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c9a8dc148190b33ff51894e2a8f9 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5d53d22d08190bc17ed4bed53804a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:26 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:46 p.m.