Triple
T20883148
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Danny Stevens |
E514202
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipWithSigmund |
P142236
|
FINISHED |
| Object | best friend |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: best friend | Statement: [Danny Stevens, relationshipWithSigmund, best friend]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipWithSigmund Context triple: [Danny Stevens, relationshipWithSigmund, best friend]
-
A.
approachToFreud
Indicates a relationship where one entity’s ideas, methods, or perspective move closer to, align with, or are interpreted in terms of Freud’s psychoanalytic framework.
-
B.
relationshipToSocrates
Indicates the specific familial, social, or conceptual connection that one entity has to Socrates.
-
C.
inPsychoanalyticCanon
Indicates that a work, concept, or figure is recognized as part of the established body of psychoanalytic theory and literature.
-
D.
relationshipToDrWatson
Indicates the specific personal or professional relationship an entity has with Dr. Watson.
-
E.
philosophicalRelationTo
Indicates a conceptual or theoretical connection one entity holds toward another within a philosophical framework or viewpoint.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4f733f081908a401c0b7beb0b9f |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c67b03088190be7cbcde8c59509a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c9a8dc148190b33ff51894e2a8f9 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5d53c4d6881909b4d0a716fa5ed4a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:26 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:46 p.m.