Triple

T20874029
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Inverted Boomerang E513969 entity
Predicate restraintPurpose P142197 FINISHED
Object to secure riders during inversions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: to secure riders during inversions | Statement: [Inverted Boomerang, restraintPurpose, to secure riders during inversions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: restraintPurpose
Context triple: [Inverted Boomerang, restraintPurpose, to secure riders during inversions]
  • A. restraintType
    Indicates the specific kind or method of restraint applied in a given situation or relationship.
  • B. restraintManufacturer
    Indicates that one entity is the manufacturer or producer of a restraint device used to limit or control another entity.
  • C. usesRestraints
    Indicates that one entity applies or employs physical or procedural restraints on another entity.
  • D. aimOfPunishment
    Indicates that a specified purpose or objective is the intended goal or rationale behind a particular act of punishment.
  • E. usedToDetain
    Indicates that something serves or functioned as a means, tool, or facility for holding or confining someone against their will.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4f675cc8190b4e745225b62eb66 completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6c46639308190a616193f3975d453 completed April 21, 2026, 12:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5c9a8dc148190b33ff51894e2a8f9 completed April 20, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5d53c4d6881909b4d0a716fa5ed4a completed April 20, 2026, 7:26 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:45 p.m.