Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States | Statement: [Arthur Andersen, supremeCourtCase, Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States]

Target entity: Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States
Context triple: [Arthur Andersen, supremeCourtCase, Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States]

• A. United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP chosen
  United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case overturning the criminal conviction of Enron’s accounting firm for obstruction of justice, significantly shaping standards for prosecuting corporate document destruction.
• B. Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder
  Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that private damages actions under SEC Rule 10b-5 require proof of scienter, not mere negligence.
• C. Eisner v. Macomber
  Eisner v. Macomber is a 1920 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a pro rata stock dividend was not taxable income under the Sixteenth Amendment, shaping early federal income tax doctrine.
• D. SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.
  SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. is a landmark U.S. securities law case that broadly defined insider trading liability and the disclosure obligations of publicly traded companies under federal law.
• E. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
  Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer is a landmark 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential power by ruling that President Truman lacked authority to seize steel mills during the Korean War without congressional approval.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.