Triple
T20844200
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Massachusetts Rules of Evidence |
E513176
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Article IV Relevance and Its Limits |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Article IV Relevance and Its Limits | Statement: [Massachusetts Rules of Evidence, hasPart, Article IV Relevance and Its Limits]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Article IV Relevance and Its Limits Context triple: [Massachusetts Rules of Evidence, hasPart, Article IV Relevance and Its Limits]
-
A.
Article IV – Relevance and Its Limits
chosen
Article IV – Relevance and Its Limits is a section of the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence that defines when evidence is considered relevant and sets boundaries on its admissibility in court.
-
B.
A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law
A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law is a book in which Justice Antonin Scalia articulates and defends his textualist approach to statutory and constitutional interpretation in the American legal system.
-
C.
The Concept of Law
The Concept of Law is a foundational work of legal philosophy that systematically analyzes the nature of law, legal systems, and the relationship between law, morality, and social rules.
-
D.
Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict
"Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict" is a scholarly book by Cass Sunstein that examines how legal reasoning operates amid deep political and moral disagreements in democratic societies.
-
E.
The Critical Legal Studies Movement
The Critical Legal Studies Movement is a seminal work of legal theory that critiques traditional legal doctrine and argues for a more transformative, socially responsive understanding of law.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4f4898081908209e58edb8f9c45 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c34deef88190992b959b83bc59b1 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:43 p.m.