Triple

T20827562
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gamma Canis Majoris E512743 entity
Predicate isBrightGiant P141980 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Gamma Canis Majoris, isBrightGiant, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isBrightGiant
Context triple: [Gamma Canis Majoris, isBrightGiant, true]
  • A. isBrightStar
    Indicates that the subject star has a high intrinsic luminosity or apparent brightness compared to typical stars.
  • B. isRedGiantBranchStar
    Indicates that a star is currently in the red giant branch phase of stellar evolution, characterized by hydrogen shell burning around an inert helium core and an expanded, luminous outer envelope.
  • C. isBrightestKTypeGiantVisible
    Indicates that the entity is the brightest visible star among those classified as K-type giant stars.
  • D. hasBrightStarDesignation
    Indicates that an entity is assigned a specific identifier in the Bright Star Catalogue.
  • E. isGiantStar
    Indicates that a star has an exceptionally large radius and luminosity compared to main-sequence stars, classifying it as a giant star.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4ce39108190a6e8e5df4f1c8dc5 completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6c2fe54608190a061274bf4316610 completed April 21, 2026, 12:21 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5c9a1f4f48190aa9fb4ef8f8aea5a completed April 20, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5d53c4d6881909b4d0a716fa5ed4a completed April 20, 2026, 7:26 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:42 p.m.