Triple
T20810588
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Satna district |
E512285
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRiver |
P165
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tamas River |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tamas River | Statement: [Satna district, hasRiver, Tamas River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tamas River Context triple: [Satna district, hasRiver, Tamas River]
-
A.
Tamas River
chosen
The Tamas River, also known as the Tamsa, is a river in central India that flows through the states of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh before joining the Ganges.
-
B.
Târgului River
The Târgului River is a river in southern Romania that flows through Argeș County and contributes to the Argeș River basin.
-
C.
Noteć River
The Noteć River is a significant river in western Poland that flows through the Greater Poland and Kuyavian-Pomeranian regions, forming part of an important waterway linking the Vistula and Oder river basins.
-
D.
Strujinoasa River
The Strujinoasa River is a smaller watercourse in Romania that serves as a tributary within the Putna River basin.
-
E.
Vedea River
The Vedea River is a river in southern Romania that flows through several counties before emptying into the Danube.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4cd25088190b48ca9700cd24efc |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c2d27a4881908b34679385d8b94b |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:40 p.m.